Pantera Research: Crypto Users Lack Patience, Instant Gratification Outweighs Future Gains
Original article by: Paul Veradittakit
Original translation: TechFlow
Do cryptocurrency users need intervention?
A study by Pantera Research Lab found that cryptocurrency users exhibited a high current preference and a low discount factor, suggesting a strong preference for instant gratification.
The quasi-hyperbolic discounting model, characterized by parameters such as present bias (ꞵ) and discount factor (𝛿), helps understand individuals’ tendency to prefer immediate returns over future gains, a behavior that is particularly evident in the volatile and speculative cryptocurrency market.
This research can be used to optimize token distribution, such as airdrops to reward early users, decentralize governance, and market new products.
introduce
A classic example in Silicon Valley startup stories is Paypal’s decision to pay users $10 to use its product. The logic behind this is that if you can pay people to join, eventually the network value will be high enough that new people will join for free and you can stop paying. This actually seems to have worked, as PayPal was able to stop paying and continue to grow, thereby bootstrapping the network effect.
In the cryptocurrency space, we’ve taken this approach and expanded upon it, using airdrops to not only pay people to join, but often require them to use our product for a period of time.
Quasi-Hyperbolic Discount Model
Airdrops have become a multifaceted tool for rewarding early adopters, decentralizing protocol governance, and promoting new products. In particular, developing distribution criteria has become an art when it comes to determining who should receive the rewards and the value of their efforts. In this context, the amount and timing of token distribution (usually through mechanisms such as vesting periods or gradual release) play an important role. These decisions should be based on systematic analysis rather than relying on speculation, emotion, or precedent. Using a more quantitative framework can ensure fairness and alignment with long-term goal strategies.
The quasi-hyperbolic discounting model provides a mathematical framework for exploring the choices that individuals make when weighing rewards between different points in time. Its application is particularly relevant in areas where impulsivity and time inconsistency significantly influence decision making, such as financial decision making and health-related behavior.
The model is driven by two specific parameters: current preference (ꞵ) and discount factor (𝛿).
Current Preferences (ꞵ):
This parameter measures an individuals tendency to prioritize immediate rewards over distant rewards. Its values range between 0 and 1, where 1 indicates no current preference, reflecting a balanced, time-consistent evaluation of future rewards. Values closer to 0 indicate a stronger current preference, indicating a high preference for immediate rewards.
For example, when choosing between taking $50 today or $100 in a year, someone with a high present preference (close to 0) would prefer to take the $50 immediately rather than wait for the larger sum.
Discount Factor (𝛿):
This parameter describes the rate at which the value of a future reward declines as the time to its realization increases, taking into account its perceived value which naturally declines with delay. The discount factor is more accurately quantified over longer, multi-year intervals. This factor exhibits considerable variability when evaluating two options over a short period (less than a year), as immediate circumstances may disproportionately influence perception.
For the general population, research suggests that the discount factor is typically around 0.9. However, in groups with a stronger propensity to gamble, this value is often significantly lower. Research suggests that habitual gamblers have an average discount factor of just under 0.8, while problem gamblers have a discount factor closer to 0.5.
Using the above terminology, we can express the utility U of receiving a reward x at time t as follows:
U(t) = tU(x) U(t) = tU(x)
The model captures how the value of rewards changes over time: immediate rewards are valued at full utility, while future rewards are adjusted for current preferences and exponential decay.
experiment
Last year, Pantera Research Lab conducted a study to quantify the behavioral tendencies of cryptocurrency users. We surveyed participants with two simple questions designed to measure their preference for instant payments versus future value.
This approach helps us determine representative values of ꞵ and 𝛿. Our research finds that a representative sample of cryptocurrency users exhibits current preferences slightly above 0.4 and significantly lower discount factors.
The study revealed that cryptocurrency users have above-average current preferences and low discount factors, indicating that they tend to be impatient and prefer instant gratification over future gains.
This can be attributed to several interrelated factors in the cryptocurrency environment:
Cyclical market behavior: The cryptocurrency market is known for its volatility and cyclicality, with tokens often experiencing rapid swings in value. This cyclicality impacts user behavior because many people are accustomed to navigating these cycles rather than adopting long-term investment strategies more common in traditional finance. Frequent ups and downs can cause users to discount future value more steeply, fearing that a potential drop could wipe out profits.
Token Stigma: The survey specifically asked about tokens and their perceived future value, which may highlight the deep-seated stigma associated with token trading. The stigma of token valuations associated with cyclicality and speculation reinforces caution about long-term investments. Additionally, if the survey measured fiat currency or other forms of rewards, the results may be more consistent with the global average, indicating that the nature of the reward may significantly influence the observed discounting behavior.
Speculative nature of cryptocurrency applications: Today’s cryptocurrency ecosystem is deeply rooted in speculation and trading, and these characteristics are particularly prevalent in its most successful applications. This tendency shows that current users overwhelmingly prefer speculative platforms, a preference reflected in the survey results, which show a strong preference for immediate financial gains.
Although the findings may differ from typical human behavioral norms, they reflect the characteristics and tendencies of the current cryptocurrency user population. This distinction is particularly important for projects designing airdrops and token distributions, as understanding these unique behaviors can enable more strategic planning and reward system structures.
For example, Drift, a perpetual contract DEX on Solana, recently launched its native token DRIFT. The Drift team included a time delay mechanism in its token distribution strategy, offering double rewards to users who wait 6 hours after the token is released to claim the airdrop. The time delay is designed to alleviate the congestion usually caused by bots in the early stages of the airdrop and help stabilize token performance by reducing the surge of early sellers.
In fact, only 7.5k or 15% (at the time of writing) of potential recipients did not wait 6 hours to claim their doubled rewards. Based on our findings, Drift can delay for several months and statistically should meet the needs of most end users.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
TRUMP Token Gears Up for a Massive 300% Surge – Weekly Chart Signals a Bullish Breakout
Popcat’s Path to $2.5: Analyzing Recent Price Movements and Market Sentiment
XRP on the Verge: Signs of a Breakout with Increasing Activity and Robust Metrics
Huge Migration After Experts Polkadot Price Analysis Can RUNE Rise Or is It RBLK’s Time?