• Coinbase is asking for an interlocutory appeal, claiming there is confusion regarding where the Howey Test stands in secondary market crypto transactions.
  • The case that is currently ongoing against Ripple is affecting the decisions made by Coinbase as both of these cases involve the SEC interpretation of securities laws.
  • These cases enlighten the broader need of regulatory guidance for the respective industry in discussion.

In the legal tussle with the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Coinbase has sought permission to appeal mid-case to the U.S Court of Appeals from the Judge Katherine Polk Failla. This request is prompted by the evolution of the Ripple case in which an interlocutory appeal by the SEC regarding the application of the Howey test to secondary market transactions equally exists. Coinbase focuses on the fact that the status of the Howey Test for interpreting secondary market transactions in the digital assets market remains uncertain.

🚨NEW: @coinbase cites the @SECGov ’s @Ripple appeal in a new letter to urge Judge Failla to grant its own request for interlocutory appeal.

Coinbase notes that the SEC’s appeal underscores the ambiguity surrounding the Howey Test’s application to secondary market sales, further… pic.twitter.com/q7K9WmR4Ho

— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) October 5, 2024

Ripple’s Impact on Coinbase’s Case

The appeal now pending in the Second Circuit involves Ripple and thus occupies center stage at Coinbase’s supplication. The most recent is the SEC appeal of the Ripple case , which has questioned the role of the court in interpreting the Howey Test indicating more confusion as to how the US law of securities regulates the digital asset. 

The legal issue Kaiser has underlined is that whether or not the pre-suit exigent circumstance defense exists is still an open question that requires resolution from a higher court and where the determination of such issue is far from clear. To support the interlocutory appeal motion, Coinbase used SEC ‘s words recognising legal issues in Ripple as its argumentation.

The SEC’s View on Deals in the Secondary Market

In its Ripple appeal, the SEC argues that the Howey Test should apply to transactions on secondary markets involving digital assets. Coinbase’s defense rests with the fact that more clarity from the higher courts is needed due to the SEC’s continued flip-flop on the issue. Ripple’s case has already had a significant impact on how regulators and courts examine some types of digital assets and now Coinbase wants to leverage the dust for an improved legal status.

Read CRYPTONEWSLAND on google news

Coinbase’s request raises a fundamental issue of regulation on cryptocurrency deals. These cases have come at a time when there are already several high-profile cases involving crypto securities; consequently, there remains increased pressure to have better definitions on how current securities laws can be applied to digital assets.

disclaimer read more

Crypto News Land, also abbreviated as "CNL", is an independent media entity - we are not affiliated with any company in the blockchain and cryptocurrency industry. We aim to provide fresh and relevant content that will help build up the crypto space since we believe in its potential to impact the world for the better. All of our news sources are credible and accurate as we know it, although we do not make any warranty as to the validity of their statements as well as their motive behind it. While we make sure to double-check the veracity of information from our sources, we do not make any assurances as to the timeliness and completeness of any information in our website as provided by our sources. Moreover, we disclaim any information on our website as investment or financial advice. We encourage all visitors to do your own research and consult with an expert in the relevant subject before making any investment or trading decision.