Preço de DAR Open NetworkD

Seems like some misunderstood my message. I don’t say with certainty there will be no new high or that BTC.D for sure will not fall. I cannot know this. What I say is that we‘re in very uncertain times and I prefer to play relevant Levels instead of Holding and hoping for an event that might or might not come, especially when looking at the Stock Market. There are thousands out there that feel devestated rn and I would too if I just held my bags through all of this. What I want to do is to encourage you to be the Player and Not the one being played. To have control over your Investments / trading by getting in at key levels with a clear plan and different scenarios layed out and invalidation. I‘m no bear, I‘m no bull. And I tell you one thing: for my mental Health and well being going that route was the best decision ever.

Bitcoin‘s daily timeframe reveals persistent liquidation pressures after a swift retreat from the $106,000 pinnacle triggered a cascading drop. A fleeting stabilization at $78,197 now anchors interim stability, though the $94,000 ceiling stifles recovery efforts. Pronounced bearish formations, amplified by vigorous transactional flows, fortify pessimistic expectations, with $82,000 emerging as a plausible floor should downward forces intensify. BTC/USD 1D chart via Bitstamp on March 7, 2025. While shorter-term metrics—such as the exponential moving average (EMA 10) at $88,933 and simple moving average (SMA 10) at $87,407—flash warnings of frailty, the enduring exponential moving average (EMA 200) at $85,831 and simple moving average (SMA 200) at $83,037 whisper of latent demand. Zooming to the four-hour window, bitcoin’s swift downturn from $95,152 illustrates faltering vitality above $90,000. Escalating sell-side participation cements the descent, while the exponential moving average (EMA 10) and simple moving average (SMA 10) linger beneath current valuations, echoing bearish rhythms. BTC/USD 4H chart via Bitstamp on March 7, 2025. An unsuccessful rally above $91,000 solidifies this zone as a formidable barrier, positioning short-term bearish strategies as prudent if prices falter between $88,000 and $90,000, eyeing $85,000 or $82,000 as destinations. The hourly lens echoes immediate liquidation patterns, with repeated denials near $91,560 propelling valuations to $84,713. Subdued transactional activity hints at waning conviction, yet directional momentum leans downward. BTC/USD 1H chart via Bitstamp on March 7, 2025. Neutral readings from the relative strength index (RSI) at 42 contrast with the awesome oscillator (AO) and momentum gauges, which tilt toward distribution. Failure to conquer $88,500 may invite retreats toward $86,000 or below, though a spirited push past $87,000 with heightened participation could spark ephemeral rallies toward $89,000 or $90,000. Momentum metrics and trend-following tools collectively reinforce cautionary narratives. The commodity channel index (CCI) at -55 sits idle, while the awesome oscillator (AO) and momentum readings tilt toward pessimism. Every short- to medium-term trend tracker—from the exponential moving average (EMA 10) to the simple moving average (SMA 100)—broadcasts sell directives. Only the distant simple moving average (SMA 200) at $83,000 offers a glimmer of foundational support. With bitcoin (BTC) ensnared beneath gravitational resistance, near-term risks skew downward. Foundational tiers at $85,000, $82,000, and $78,000 may face scrutiny before equilibrium resurfaces. Absent a decisive thrust above $91,000, the path of least resistance slopes southward, inviting tests of deeper thresholds in sessions ahead. Despite short-term bearish momentum, long-term support near $83,000 and $85,000 could provide a solid foundation for a rebound if buyers step in. A breakout above $91,000 may signal renewed upside potential. Bitcoin remains in a clear downtrend, with strong resistance at $90,000 and key indicators favoring further downside. If selling pressure persists, BTC could test lower support levels near $82,000 and $78,000 before any significant recovery. 免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

In a letter addressed to David Sacks, Elizabeth Warren (D.-Mass.) questions whether the Trump administration’s moves to establish a national crypto reserve and ease regulatory burdens are designed to enrich insiders at the expense of everyday Americans. Her letter paints a picture of shadowy dealings and conflicts of interest, yet fails to acknowledge the broader truth: Cryptocurrency represents an alternative to centralized control and promotes non-custodial ownership, something she has consistently opposed. Warren’s grievances center on Trump’s recent directive to form a U.S. Crypto Strategic Reserve, which would hold select cryptocurrencies, including bitcoin and ethereum. According to Warren, the initiative is a calculated scheme benefiting wealthy investors. Yet she ignores the fact that crypto, by its very nature, is decentralized—its value dictated not by government fiat but by voluntary exchange. Rather than fearing financial liberation, Warren seeks to corral digital assets under the thumb of the nightmare bureaucratic oversight once seen under the Biden administration. Warren also criticizes the SEC’s decision to drop enforcement actions against Coinbase and to loosen regulations around meme coins, lamenting the potential profits of private citizens rather than celebrating the removal of government-imposed roadblocks to innovation. This is the essence of Warren’s philosophy: A belief that economic success must be policed, that individuals should not be trusted to manage their own financial choices, and that only the state should determine winners and losers. At the heart of Warren’s letter is a fundamental misunderstanding—or deliberate misrepresentation—of how wealth is created. Free markets, not government intervention, drive prosperity. Cryptocurrency is not a government-backed privilege but a technological breakthrough enabling financial autonomy. To Warren, however, any market beyond her control is inherently suspect. Her constant attacks on crypto are not about ethics; it is about control. By questioning Sacks’ financial history and demanding disclosures, she seeks to delegitimize those who advocate for financial freedom. But the real conflict is not one of interest—it is one of philosophy. Will America embrace innovation and individual choice, or will it succumb to the heavy hand of the Democrats’ immoral regulation? 免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

In an unlikely move, Gianni Infantino president of FIFA (Fédération Internationale de Football Association), announced that his organization is seeking to partner with crypto firms to launch a cryptocurrency dubbed “FIFA coin,” that takes advantage of the organization’s strong global brand, a $170 billion soccer industry, and the sport’s 5 billion fans. Infantino made the announcement on Friday at the White House Crypto Summit after President Donald Trump asked him to say a few words at the beginning of the event. “Imagine the potential that there is around the world, only in soccer, if we develop it,” Infantino said. “FIFA is very interested under my presidency, to develop FIFA coin, and to do it from here, from America.” He then invited summit attendees to help FIFA with the project. “I’m not an expert at all,” Infantino said. “If there is anyone here who is interested, team up with FIFA, here we are in the United States of America, and we will conquer the world of soccer with FIFA coin.” 免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

https://www.bgportable.com/events/activities/220d7610812755c9a20118c0288d8fe8?androidSdk=31&appTheme=dark&appVersion=2.50.8&clacCode=46MBKVUD&color=white&time=1741398026342