Harga LikeCoinLIKE

Figures from cryptoslam.io indicate $148.18 million in NFT exchanges during this period, alongside a 64.49% expansion in NFT buyer participation and a 49.42% rise in seller engagement. Ethereum maintained its supremacy, securing $74.61 million in sales—a 25.24% elevation—while Bitcoin claimed second place with $20.75 million, despite a 26.95% contraction. Polkadot’s Mythos captured third position at $15.37 million, succeeded by Solana’s $11.04 million (reflecting a 14.66% gain) and Polygon’s $9.25 million, which soared 24.03%. Leading the week’s collections was Mythos’ Dmarket, amassing $10.17 million, while Ethereum’s Doodles followed closely with $9.18 million. Polygon’s Courtyard secured third among collections at $8.28 million, with Pudgy Penguins, Azuki, Milady Maker, and Lil Pudgys also demonstrating vigorous activity. The period’s most extravagant purchase—a “f(x) wstETH position #425”—commanded $435,486, outpacing Bitcoin’s WZRD BRC20 ($77,120) and Cardano’s Earthnode 551 ($65,379). The week’s figures reflect a market recalibrating around Ethereum’s enduring clout and emergent challengers like Mythos, Bitcoin and Solana. While Bitcoin’s NFT foothold wobbled, buyer-seller growth hints at broadening participation beyond speculative flurries. Collections like Doodles are still absorbing positivity from their recent token airdrop announcement. 免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到[email protected]，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

Cryptocurrency holders of should we ‘’hodlers’’ love to dream big. They dream of big mansions, nice cars, and a life of ease. One such dream is associated with buying a Lamborghini and that’s where the ‘when lambo’ meme is born. Table of Contents What is ‘When Lambo?’ in crypto? The History of “When Lambo? When Lambo vs. When Moon: What’s the Difference? The Meme Culture of “When Lambo? Can You Actually Buy a Lamborghini with Bitcoin? Conclusion: Is “When Lambo?” Still Relevant Today? In this article, we’ll discuss what is ‘when lambo’ in crypto, its origin, and whether it’s still relevant in these times. What is ‘When Lambo?’ in crypto? “When Lambo” or “wen lambo” is a term used in the Bitcoin and cryptocurrency communities to refer to the point at which someone becomes financially successful enough to buy a Lamborghini sports car. The term is often used as a measure of success or wealth, and can be seen as a goal for many people in space. While there is no set amount of money that one needs to have to be considered “When Lambo,” the general consensus is that it is a very high amount. For some people, “When Lambo” may simply be a dream, while for others it may be a very real possibility. Now let’s learn what does lambo mean in crypto by learning its historical origin. You might also like: Lamborghini, Animoca Brands unveil blockchain-based supercars for web3 game The History of “When Lambo? The Cryptocurrency Consensus Investment Conference, held in 2018 in New York, influenced the popular crypto term “when lambo?” Before the conference began, three Lamborghinis were rented and parked at the venue to signal the presence of crypto investors. After this conference, the term became commercial usage in the crypto space and the “wen lambo” meme was born. A Lamborghini is an Italian luxury brand of automobile worth between $200,000 and $500,000. It became the status symbol of early crypto investors who purchased one from their successful crypto investment. One such investor is Peter Saddington, who cashed out $200,000 in 2015 from investing in 45 bitcoins he bought for under $115. The phrase “when lambo?” is a question of when a crypto investor’s investments will yield enough profit so he can purchase a Lamborghini. When Lambo vs. When Moon: What’s the Difference? The meme phrase “when moon” in the cryptocurrency sector basically implies “when will this coin’s price go up significantly?” In essence, it asks when a specific cryptocurrency’s price will rise quickly, figuratively “going to the moon” because of its enormous potential for price growth. On the other hand, ‘’wen lambo’’ doesn’t really focus on a coin’s price directly, rather on the fact that the assets that an investor is holding should go up at least equal to the price of a Lamborghini so they can cash out their holdings and buy that luxury car. The Meme Culture of “When Lambo? “When Lambo?” also signifies a meme due to the satirical undertone of the phrase or question. The phrase is used to mock newbie investors who are only in the market for quick profits, and who are not interested in holding onto their investments for the long term. The term is a play on the popular internet crypto meme culture “when moon?”, which is used to ask when a particular cryptocurrency will reach its all-time high. In the case of “When Lambo?”, the question is not about price, but about when these new investors will be able to afford to buy a Lamborghini – a status symbol often associated with those who have made it big in the world of cryptocurrency. So, in essence, the “When Lambo?” meme is a way of making fun of people who are in the market for quick gains, and who are not interested in the technology or the future of cryptocurrency. Can You Actually Buy a Lamborghini with Bitcoin? Yes, you can buy a Lamborghini with Bitcoin. In fact, there are a few Lamborghini dealerships that accept Bitcoin (BTC) as payment, including one in California and one in Switzerland. As earlier stated, in 2015, Peter Saddington purchased a Lambo with 45 BTC. Another example is an earlier case in 2014 where a user of 4chan purchased a Gallardo with 216 BTC. In essence, this was the first known transaction where an automobile dealer decided to accept crypto for the luxurious. Tesla also started receiving BTC for payment of their electric car. A Tesla Model S was sold for about 91 BTC in December 2017 when BTC topped $20k. You might also like: NFT giant Animoca Brands partners with Lamborghini Conclusion: Is “When Lambo?” Still Relevant Today? The “When Lambo?” meme continues to live on within the cryptocurrency industry, but in a somewhat different context than it had in its heyday. At first, it stood for the ideal of rapid financial gain and lavish spending supported by cryptocurrency investments. The topic of “when lambo?” seems a little out of date now that the market has developed and many investors are more concerned with long-term growth and technological advancements within the crypto field. Nevertheless, the myth endures, particularly among younger cryptocurrency aficionados who might still be drawn to the prospect of financial independence and the resulting luxury. However, the need for immediate gratification associated with tangible symbols like the Lamborghini is changing as a result of the volatility of cryptocurrency markets and the growing interest in blockchain technology and decentralized finance.

Ben Zhou, Bybit CEO, assured the public that user funds were safe and that the platform could cover losses following the largest crypto exchange hack in history. Security veterans and concerned crypto community members rallied behind Bybit on Friday, Feb. 21, after the exchange lost over $1.4 billion to hackers. The largest-ever crypto exchange hack occurred while Bybit was attempting a routine transfer, Zhou said during a livestream following the incident. Specific details about the breach points remain scarce. However, initial reports suggest that hackers tricked Bybit’s signers into authorizing a malicious transaction from the platform’s Ethereum (ETH) cold wallet. Just in: According to @zachxbt, Bybit faced a security incident (likely hacked) where $1.44B worth of funds were withdrawn.401,347 $ETH worth $1.12B90,376 $stETH worth $253.16M15,000 $cmETH worth $44.13M8,000 $mETH worth $23MLater, these funds were moved to another wallet.… pic.twitter.com/FAuoRx3Rri — Onchain Lens (@OnchainLens) February 21, 2025 You might also like: Bybit’s ETH cold wallet exploited for $1.46b Bybit employs a multi-sig structure designed by Safe to manage its ERC-20 token reserves. This wallet requires multiple team members to sign off on transactions before execution. OxCygaar, a blockchain developer and Abstract Chain contributor, theorized that bad actors attacked each signer and somehow used malware to alter the multi-sig UI. The ramifications of this scenario are ghastly, as it means the hackers may have individually identified each signer and compromised their computers or crypto wallets. idk how they knew the multisig signers, but this type of attack has happened in the past.requires identifying each signer and then getting them to unknowingly install malware so their multisig ui is compromised — cygaar (@0xCygaar) February 21, 2025 Community backs Bybit, CEO sources bridge loan ARKM tokens for any information leading to the hacker’s identification. Additionally, Safe, Bybit’s multi-sig provider, announced ongoing maintenance to strengthen safety. NEW ARKHAM INTEL BOUNTY: BYBIT HACKWe’ve created & funded a bounty to help identify the person or organization behind today’s >$1B Bybit hack.Submissions to this bounty will be shared with the Bybit team to support their investigation.Reward: 50K ARKMBounty:… pic.twitter.com/1X3QgmRdda — Arkham (@arkham) February 21, 2025 Also, Zhou said Bybit was working with other industry players like Binance, OKX, and KuCoin and law enforcement to reach a resolution. “We have filed a police report,” Zhou shared on the livestream. Zhou and Shunyet Jan, Bybit’s head of derivatives, also revealed that the exchange is negotiating a bridge loan with partners to restore Ethereum withdrawals. According to Jan, the platform will offer collateral from its treasury, primarily in Bitcoin (BTC) and stablecoins. However, Zhou emphasized that Bybit can fully cover the loss, noting that the exchange manages over $20 billion in assets. Bybit’s leadership urged the crypto community to remain patient amid platform congestion, reassuring users that other ERC-20 withdrawals and normal operations continue as usual. Bybit is Solvent even if this hack loss is not recovered, all of clients assets are 1 to 1 backed, we can cover the loss. — Ben Zhou (@benbybit) February 21, 2025 Read more: Safe wallet pauses certain functionalities after Bybit hack

South Korea to lift its ban on institutional crypto trading from 2025 Phased rollout to allow non-profits, universities, and listed companies to trade crypto South Korea looking to support blockchain businesses with clearer regulations South Korea is set to lift its ban on institutional crypto trading. Through 2025, a number of institutions, such as non-profits, universities, law enforcement agencies, and listed companies, will gain permission to trade crypto assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum. This move follows years of strict rules aimed at controlling speculation and managing money laundering risks in the crypto market South Korea’s government has long had strict regulations on crypto trading. In 2017, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) banned Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) due to concerns over speculative investments. This was followed by a ban on financial institutions offering crypto services and the start of a real-name trading system to ensure transaction accountability. By 2018, Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations were put in place, setting the stage for more detailed oversight of crypto activities. Source: Kaiko AML Checks and the … The post South Korea Ends Years-Long Ban on Institutional Crypto Trading: 2025 Target appeared first on Coin Edition.

CORE’s TVL and user growth are unmatched across all Bitcoin L2s. I’ve been tracking their growth metrics since Day 1, and two things are clear; > $CORE is clear #1 consumer chain for $BTC, and > the market potential for CORE is still undervalued. Let's delve in.🧵⬇️ Bitcoin as a store of value (SoV) is no longer the end of the story. Today, $BTC holders are looking for yield, staking opportunities, and decentralized financial products. CORE (@Coredao_Org) has emerged as the ecosystem enabling these use cases at scale without stress. ◢ Messari data confirms Core’s explosive growth: + Daily Active Addresses are up +160% QoQ, reflecting surging adoption. + TVL grew 90% last quarter to $900M + Over 1,298 $BTC and 16.5M CORE dual-staked in Q4 alone. These metrics signal an undeniable trend; Bitcoin is being used for real financial activity on CORE; staking, lending, borrowing, and yield earning on a scale no other Bitcoin L2 can match. ➜ How Core is Outpacing BTC L2 Competitors The competition? Practically non-existent. Core’s numbers crush other Bitcoin L2s in both adoption and utility: + CORE has 107x more users than Stacks, 100x BOB, and 930x Rootstock. + CORE’s TVL is 8.5x Stacks, 100x BOB, and 120x Rootstock. + CORE is the only Bitcoin L2 listed on DappRadar, thanks to its actual usage metrics. ➜ The CORE Token Price Projections If $CORE’s market cap matched Stacks’ TVL:Market Cap ratio, it would imply a $13B valuation. That's an easy 25x from its current valuation. Adjusting for CORE chain's user activity, that market cap potential soars to $53B; an astounding 100x upside. ➜ BTC DeFi on Core: Real Yield, Real Demand One of CORE’s strongest appeal is its BTCFi ecosystem, powered by dApps like Colend and BitFLUX: 1️⃣ Colend offers 14.7% APY for lending WBTC, compared to 0.03% on Aave. That’s a 490x yield advantage; driven by massive borrowing demand on CORE. 2️⃣ BitFLUX, dubbed the “Curve for Bitcoin,” provides ultra-low-slippage swaps for Bitcoin-pegged assets. Early users are in a CRV-style accumulation phase, making BitFLUX one of the best farming opportunities in BTCFi. These dApps create tangible utility for $BTC holders, drawing more users to CORE’s ecosystem and driving CORE demand. ➜ The CORE Tokenomics Edge CORE tokenomics amplify its network growth through a positive feedback loop like this: • $BTC Staking Requires $CORE: To dual-stake $BTC and earn max yield, users need $CORE tokens. • More $BTC Staked = More $CORE Locked; Every increase in staked BTC further constrains $CORE’s supply. ◢ Also, institutional demand is rising, with Custodians like BitGo already integrating CORE’s $BTC staking products. As institutional players accumulate $CORE, retail buyers have a short window to front-run this supply squeeze. This dynamic is eerily reminiscent of MicroStrategy’s buy-borrow-buy strategy with Bitcoin, except $CORE's smaller market cap makes the upside even more dramatic. ➜ Conclusion @Coredao_Org isn’t just leading BTC L2s, it’s outpacing major chains like Polygon, Sei, Arbitrum, and Optimism in weekly active wallets. Its DeFi ecosystem is maturing, $BTC staking is exploding, and user activity is hitting new ATH.