Bitget App
交易「智」變
快速買幣市場交易合約跟單BOT理財
ZKsync 價格

ZKsync 價格ZK

focusIcon
subscribe
上架
買入
報價幣種:
USD

您今天對 ZKsync 感覺如何?

IconGood良好IconBad糟糕
注意:此資訊僅供參考。

ZKsync 今日價格

ZKsync 的即時價格是今天每 (ZK / USD) $0.07090,目前市值為 $260.56M USD。24 小時交易量為 $46.94M USD。ZK 至 USD 的價格為即時更新。ZKsync 在過去 24 小時內的變化為 7.61%。其流通供應量為 3,675,000,000 。

ZK 的最高價格是多少?

ZK 的歷史最高價(ATH)為 $0.3285,於 2024-06-17 錄得。

ZK 的最低價格是多少?

ZK 的歷史最低價(ATL)為 $0.06056,於 2025-03-11 錄得。
計算 ZKsync 收益

ZKsync 價格預測

什麼時候是購買 ZK 的好時機? 我現在應該買入還是賣出 ZK?

在決定買入還是賣出 ZK 時,您必須先考慮自己的交易策略。長期交易者和短期交易者的交易活動也會有所不同。Bitget ZK 技術分析 可以提供您交易參考。
根據 ZK 4 小時技術分析,交易訊號為 賣出
根據 ZK 1 日技術分析,交易訊號為 強力賣出
根據 ZK 1 週技術分析,交易訊號為 強力賣出

ZK 在 2026 的價格是多少?

根據 ZK 的歷史價格表現預測模型,預計 ZK 的價格將在 2026 達到 $0.08188

ZK 在 2031 的價格是多少?

2031,ZK 的價格預計將上漲 +36.00%。 到 2031 底,預計 ZK 的價格將達到 $0.1489,累計投資報酬率為 +140.63%。

ZKsync 價格歷史(USD)

過去一年,ZKsync 價格上漲了 -75.30%。在此期間,ZK 兌 USD 的最高價格為 $0.3285,ZK 兌 USD 的最低價格為 $0.06056。
時間漲跌幅(%)漲跌幅(%)最低價相應時間內 {0} 的最低價。最高價 最高價
24h+7.61%$0.06056$0.07116
7d-15.12%$0.06056$0.08956
30d-32.03%$0.06056$0.1153
90d-70.54%$0.06056$0.2465
1y-75.30%$0.06056$0.3285
全部時間-75.30%$0.06056(2025-03-11, 今天 )$0.3285(2024-06-17, 268 天前 )

ZKsync 市場資訊

ZKsync 市值走勢圖

市值
$260,555,133.72
完全稀釋市值
$1,488,886,478.39
排名
立即購買 ZKsync

ZKsync 行情

  • #
  • 幣對
  • 類型
  • 價格
  • 24 小時交易量
  • 操作
  • 1
  • ZK/USDT
  • 現貨
  • 0.0704
  • $1.07M
  • ‌交易
  • ZKsync 持幣分布集中度

    巨鯨
    投資者
    散戶

    ZKsync 地址持有時長分布

    長期持幣者
    游資
    交易者
    coinInfo.name(12)即時價格表
    loading

    ZKsync 評級

    社群的平均評分
    4.6
    100 筆評分
    此內容僅供參考。

    ZKsync (ZK) 簡介

    什麼是 zkSync

    zkSync 是以太坊的 Layer 2 擴展解決方案,旨在增強網路的交易吞吐量並降低交易費用,同時保有安全性和去中心化的核心價值。zkSync 零知識匯總(zk-rollup)技術由 Matter Labs 開發,致力於解決以太坊的可擴展性挑戰。

    以太坊是世界第二大區塊鏈,面臨著可擴展性和高交易費用的問題,特別是在網路活動頻繁的時期。zkSync 旨在聚合鏈下多個交易,並向以太坊區塊鏈提交單一證明,以解決這些問題,從而顯著減少運算負載和相關成本。因此,zkSync 是有效、可持續擴展以太坊的一項重要發展。

    相關頁面

    官方文件: https://docs.zksync.io/

    官方網站: https://zksync.io/

    zkSync 如何運作?

    zkSync 採用 zk-rollup 技術,提高以太坊網路的效率。本質上,zk-rollups 捆綁了數百個鏈下交易,建立了加密證明,以證明這些交易是有效的。然後將該證明提交給以太坊主網進行驗證。由於僅需要在鏈上驗證證明,因此該過程大大地減少了以太坊網路的負載,從而降低了燃料費並縮短了交易時間。

    此外,zkSync 被設計為具有 EVM(以太坊虛擬機)兼容性。這意味著開發人員可以在 zkSync 上部署現有的以太坊智能合約,而無需重寫程式碼。這類兼容性降低了開發人員的進入門檻,並促進去中心化應用程式(DApp)無縫遷移至 zkSync,有助於該擴展解決方案的更廣泛採用。

    zkSync 還結合了原生帳戶抽象,透過允許與區塊鏈進行更直觀和用戶友善的互動,以強化用戶體驗。用戶可以自動付款,以任何代幣支付燃料費,甚至讓其他方承擔這些費用。這種靈活性旨在讓更多人使用區塊鏈技術,進一步推動了 zkSync 的採用。

    安全性是 zkSync 的另一個重要面向。該協議歷經廣泛的審計和壓力測試,以確保其穩健性。透過繼承以太坊主網的安全性並新增額外的保護層,zkSync 為各種區塊鏈應用程式,特別是去中心化金融(DeFi)領域的應用程式,提供了高度安全的環境。

    什麼 ZK 代幣?

    ZK zkSync 生態系中的原生功能型和治理代幣,在維護和增強協議的運作方面,發揮關鍵作用。ZK 代幣的主要用途之一是支付 zkSync 網路上的交易費用。與以太坊主網相比,使用 ZK 代幣付費可降低成本。

    除了交易費用之外,ZK 代幣也是 zkSync 去中心化治理模式中不可或缺的一部分。代幣持有者可參與關鍵決策過程,並對影響協議未來方向的提案進行投票。這種民主方式確保了 zkSync 的發展和演變能反映出社群的集體利益。

    此外,ZK 代幣還可以激勵網路安全和參與度。用戶可以質押 ZK 代幣來支援網路的安全基礎設施,從而獲得額外的代幣作為獎勵。此外,zkSync 生態系內的流動性提供者將獲得 ZK 代幣獎勵,確保去中心化交易所(DEX)和平台上的其他金融活動有充足的流動性。ZK 的總供應量為 210 億枚。

    zkSync 是一項好投資嗎?

    投資任何加密貨幣,包括 zkSync,都需要仔細評估和徹底研究。加密貨幣市場的波動性,意味著價格可能在短期內大幅震盪。在進行投資之前,請務必了解市場動態、評估您的風險承受能力並考慮收益和損失的可能性。掌握市場趨勢並與加密貨幣社群互動,有助於確定 zkSync 是否為 2024 年的一項好投資。

    此外,分散風險是管理投資風險的關鍵策略。與其將所有資源投入一項資產,不如考慮將投資分散到各種加密貨幣和傳統資產。這種方法有助於減輕潛在損失,並打造更平衡的投資組合。始終保持資訊靈通,隨時準備根據市場變化調整投資策略,確保您的投資組合保持穩健,並為未來做好充分準備。

    如何購買 zkSyncZK)?

    想投資 zkSyncZK)嗎?只需 2 分鐘,即可在 Bitget 上建立帳戶 ,並開始交易 ZK

    zkSync 相關文章:

    zkSync Z K ):透過零知識證明,擴展以太坊

    如何購買 ZKsync(ZK)

    建立您的免費 Bitget 帳戶

    建立您的免費 Bitget 帳戶

    使用您的電子郵件地址/手機號碼在 Bitget 註冊,並建立強大的密碼以確保您的帳戶安全
    認證您的帳戶

    認證您的帳戶

    輸入您的個人資訊並上傳有效的身份照片進行身份認證
    將 ZKsync 兌換為 ZK

    將 ZKsync 兌換為 ZK

    我們將為您示範使用多種支付方式在 Bitget 上購買 ZKsync

    交易 ZK 永續合約

    在 Bitget 上註冊並購買 USDT 或 ZK 後,您可以開始交易衍生品,包括 ZK 合約和槓桿交易,增加收益。

    ZK 的目前價格為 $0.07090,24 小時價格變化為 +7.61%。交易者可透過做多或做空 ZK 合約獲利。

    ZK 合約交易指南

    跟單交易專家,進行 ZK 跟單交易!

    在 Bitget 註冊並成功購買 USDT 或 ZK 後,您還可以跟單交易專家開始跟單交易。

    ZKsync 動態

    ZKSync 提議將鏡頭鏈納入 Elastic Network,社區投票開放至 10 月 XNUMX 日
    ZKSync 提議將鏡頭鏈納入 Elastic Network,社區投票開放至 10 月 XNUMX 日

    簡單來說 ZKSync 已發起將 Lens Chain 整合到其 Elastic Network 中的社群投票,目前投票已開放並將持續到 10 月 XNUMX 日。

    Mpost2025-03-07 10:11
    以太坊基金會宣布成立 ZKnox,專注於後量子密碼學
    以太坊基金會宣布成立 ZKnox,專注於後量子密碼學

    簡單來說 以太坊基金會宣布成立ZKnox,這是一個專注於高級加密技術的新研究機構,目標是提供有影響力的開源程式碼,以增強以太坊的安全性和效率。

    Mpost2025-03-05 08:22
    更多 ZKsync 動態

    用戶還在查詢 ZKsync 的價格。

    ZKsync 的目前價格是多少?

    ZKsync 的即時價格為 $0.07(ZK/USD),目前市值為 $260,555,133.72 USD。由於加密貨幣市場全天候不間斷交易,ZKsync 的價格經常波動。您可以在 Bitget 上查看 ZKsync 的市場價格及其歷史數據。

    ZKsync 的 24 小時交易量是多少?

    在最近 24 小時內,ZKsync 的交易量為 $46.94M。

    ZKsync 的歷史最高價是多少?

    ZKsync 的歷史最高價是 $0.3285。這個歷史最高價是 ZKsync 自推出以來的最高價。

    我可以在 Bitget 上購買 ZKsync 嗎?

    可以,ZKsync 目前在 Bitget 的中心化交易平台上可用。如需更詳細的說明,請查看我們很有幫助的 如何購買 Polyhedra Network 指南。

    我可以透過投資 ZKsync 獲得穩定的收入嗎?

    當然,Bitget 推出了一個 策略交易平台,其提供智能交易策略,可以自動執行您的交易,幫您賺取收益。

    我在哪裡能以最低的費用購買 ZKsync?

    Bitget提供行業領先的交易費用和市場深度,以確保交易者能够從投資中獲利。 您可通過 Bitget 交易所交易。

    透過 Bitget App 購買
    數分鐘完成帳戶註冊,即可透過信用卡或銀行轉帳購買加密貨幣。
    Download Bitget APP on Google PlayDownload Bitget APP on AppStore
    透過 Bitget 交易所交易
    將加密貨幣存入 Bitget 交易所,交易流動性大且費用低

    影片部分 - 快速認證、快速交易

    play cover
    如何在 Bitget 完成身分認證以防範詐騙
    1. 登入您的 Bitget 帳戶。
    2. 如果您是 Bitget 的新用戶,請觀看我們的教學,以了解如何建立帳戶。
    3. 將滑鼠移到您的個人頭像上,點擊「未認證」,然後點擊「認證」。
    4. 選擇您簽發的國家或地區和證件類型,然後根據指示進行操作。
    5. 根據您的偏好,選擇「手機認證」或「電腦認證」。
    6. 填寫您的詳細資訊,提交身分證影本,並拍攝一張自拍照。
    7. 提交申請後,身分認證就完成了!
    加密貨幣投資(包括透過 Bitget 線上購買 ZKsync)具有市場風險。Bitget 為您提供購買 ZKsync 的簡便方式,並且盡最大努力讓用戶充分了解我們在交易所提供的每種加密貨幣。但是,我們不對您購買 ZKsync 可能產生的結果負責。此頁面和其包含的任何資訊均不代表對任何特定加密貨幣的背書認可,任何價格數據均採集自公開互聯網,不被視為來自Bitget的買賣要約。

    買入

    ‌交易

    理財

    ZK
    USD
    1 ZK = 0.07090 USD
    在所有主流交易平台中,Bitget 提供最低的交易手續費。VIP 等級越高,費率越優惠。

    Bitget 觀點

    Cryptofrontnews
    Cryptofrontnews
    2天前
    PoS Outshines PoW, The Future of Blockchain Is Clearer Than Ever
    Robert Sasu on X emphasizes the strengths of Proof-of-Stake (PoS) over Proof-of-Work (PoW). PoS dominates across security, decentralization, and economic efficiency. While PoW allows open participation, Delegated Proof-of-Stake (dPoS) also enables accessibility with minimal initial capital. However, broader distribution remains necessary for credibility. Enhanced governance, akin to Switzerland’s model, could improve decision-making and encourage participation. Blockchain’s power lies in decentralization , automation, and provable history. Consequently, cryptocurrency emerged from blockchain rather than vice versa. More development and public involvement are essential to maximize its potential. Justin Bons asserts that PoS outperforms PoW in all aspects. It offers superior security, fairness, and economic sustainability. He questions why PoW chains remain relevant when PoS technology has advanced significantly. Many still support PoW, possibly due to financial interests rather than logical reasoning. Despite PoW’s historical significance, PoS provides a more scalable and efficient framework for blockchain networks. The blockchain development team from Iron Fish was purchased by Base, a Layer 2 initiative supported by Coinbase. The acquisition is intended to increase Base’s ecosystem’s privacy. Zero-knowledge proofs, or zk-SNARKs, are utilized by Iron Fish, a proof-of-work blockchain with a privacy focus , to facilitate private transactions. The acquisition does not include Iron Fish’s blockchain or native token. Instead, it focuses solely on integrating the development team’s expertise into Base. This ensures Iron Fish remains independent while benefiting from Base’s privacy initiatives. Iron Fish confirmed the transition on X, stating its commitment to scaling privacy solutions. Founder Elena Nadolinski will retain her position on the Iron Fish Foundation board. This implies Iron Fish’s governance remains intact despite the team’s transition. Iron Fish launched its mainnet in 2023 after two years of incubation. However, it failed to fly. It raised $28 million in 2021 with support from Andreessen Horowitz to develop its privacy blockchain. Nevertheless, adoption problems were still present despite the capital. This acquisition marks a strategic shift for the Iron Fish team. It allows them to contribute privacy-preserving primitives to Base while maintaining Iron Fish’s autonomy. As blockchain privacy solutions advance, this move signifies a broader industry focus on security and user protection. DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
    WHY+4.98%
    X+3.64%
    Rowling
    Rowling
    3天前
    How Mint Blockchain Compares to Ethereum and Solana in Scalability
    The Mint Blockchain, Ethereum, and Solana are all prominent blockchain networks, but they differ significantly in terms of scalability, consensus mechanisms, and overall design. Let's break down their scalability features: 1. Ethereum: Ethereum, being one of the oldest and most widely used smart contract platforms, initially struggled with scalability, particularly in its proof-of-work (PoW) model, due to network congestion and high transaction fees. However, Ethereum 2.0 (transitioned to Proof-of-Stake (PoS)) and layer-2 scaling solutions have improved scalability. Layer-1 Scalability: Ethereum's scalability has been limited by its block size and the number of transactions it can process per second (TPS). On Ethereum 1.0 (PoW), it could handle roughly 15-30 TPS. Ethereum 2.0: Ethereum 2.0 aims to improve scalability by introducing sharding (splitting the network into smaller pieces, or "shards", to increase parallel processing) and PoS. This will help Ethereum scale to thousands of TPS in the long term. However, sharding and full Ethereum 2.0 upgrades are still in development. Layer-2 Solutions: Solutions like Optimistic Rollups, zk-Rollups, and sidechains are already deployed to offload transactions from the main chain and process them at a faster rate, effectively boosting scalability on Ethereum. 2. Solana: Solana is designed from the ground up to prioritize scalability. Its architecture allows for much faster transaction speeds and lower fees compared to Ethereum. Proof of History (PoH): Solana uses a unique consensus mechanism called Proof of History (PoH) combined with Proof of Stake (PoS). PoH timestamps transactions, allowing for parallelization and speeding up the validation process, leading to higher scalability. TPS: Solana can handle 50,000+ transactions per second (TPS), and theoretically, this could scale even higher with optimizations. This makes Solana one of the most scalable blockchains in existence today, significantly outperforming Ethereum in raw transaction throughput. Low Fees: Solana's high scalability also leads to very low transaction fees (often fractions of a cent), making it attractive for high-frequency, low-value transactions. 3. Mint Blockchain: The Mint Blockchain is relatively newer and often described as a blockchain focused on solving some of the scalability challenges that Ethereum and Solana face, but it comes with its own unique approach. Scalability Features: The Mint Blockchain emphasizes simplicity and efficiency, with its consensus mechanism designed for high throughput. It is built to be a highly scalable layer-1 blockchain. TPS: The Mint Blockchain claims to support over 10,000 TPS, though it isn't as widely tested or proven as Solana in terms of real-world transaction volume and scalability. However, the Mint Blockchain’s focus is on handling a large number of transactions quickly, with lower energy consumption and reduced operational costs. Low Latency: Mint Blockchain is also designed for low latency and fast finality, meaning transactions are confirmed rapidly, which is essential for scalability in applications that need quick execution times. Comparison in Scalability: Transactions Per Second (TPS): Solana: 50,000+ TPS (with potential for even higher). Mint Blockchain: Claims of 10,000+ TPS. Ethereum: 15-30 TPS on Ethereum 1.0, with Ethereum 2.0 + layer-2 solutions aiming for thousands of TPS. Transaction Fees: Solana: Extremely low (fractions of a cent). Mint Blockchain: Aims for low fees, but likely higher than Solana. Ethereum: High fees during congestion (can range from a few dollars to more), but Ethereum 2.0 and layer-2 scaling should reduce fees. Finality: Solana: Fast finality, with block times of around 400ms. Mint Blockchain: Low latency, rapid finality. Ethereum: Finality is slower compared to Solana (usually around 12-14 seconds for block confirmation, but Ethereum 2.0 and layer-2 solutions can improve this). Conclusion: Scalability Leader: Solana is the clear leader in scalability with its high TPS and low fees, largely due to its unique PoH consensus and architecture. Ethereum: With its Ethereum 2.0 upgrades and layer-2 solutions, Ethereum is catching up in terms of scalability but still lags behind Solana in pure transaction throughput. Mint Blockchain: While promising, the Mint Blockchain is newer and less proven in large-scale applications, but it aims to solve some of the same scalability challenges faced by Ethereum and other blockchains. In terms of raw scalability (TPS), Solana currently holds the edge, but each blockchain has its strengths depending on use cases (e.g., Ethereum’s established ecosystem vs. Mint’s focus on efficiency). $MINT
    ZK+8.30%
    UP+4.70%
    polaris_xbt
    polaris_xbt
    2025/03/06 13:05
    $ZK After a while, this chart is getting interesting again. We've swept the equal lows, and I'll be watching for longs. Two approaches here: 🔹Position early at these levels. 🔹 Wait for a confirmed trend reversal above 0.108.
    ZK+8.30%
    Stacy Muur
    Stacy Muur
    2025/03/05 18:35
    For the first time ever, a ZK-proof was verified on Bitcoin mainnet, a breakthrough once thought impossible. At the center of it all? @BTC_OS My deep dive ↓
    BTC+5.77%
    BITCOIN+10.10%
    hitesh.eth_
    hitesh.eth_
    2025/03/05 05:50
    Namada uses a tech called MASP. MASP is a zero-knowledge circuit (zk-SNARK) that works on data protection guarantees. More users putting assets into shielded sets would increase the data protection guarantee for the whole network.
    ZK+8.30%

    相關資產

    熱門加密貨幣
    按市值計算的8大加密貨幣。
    相近市值
    在所有 Bitget 資產中,這8種資產的市值最接近 ZKsync。